I’ve been working on a project inspired by the Center for Investigative Reporting and moderated by Kaggle. I used a network analysis of the movement of money between campaign committees to measure the extent to which different campaigns and different committees were more or less independent, controlling, or broadly influential. It turns out that corporations have the most broadly influential committees while the most seasoned congressional candidates are the most independent. However, when you look at the committees that are the most controlling or dependent, things get a bit interesting. You can download the report and raw results at Influence, Control, Dependent, and Independent. The code will be up soon.
- RT @_Happy_Gilmore: Boston is probably the only major city that if you fuck with them, they will shut down the whole city...stop everyth ... 1 month ago
- @BostonDotCom is there a description of what suspect 2's wearing? We're in Brighton seeing some people walking on the street at a distance. 1 month ago
- #decision2012 has any ticket won when both the pres and vice pres lost their home states? @AlexNBCNews Our research indicates not since 1950 6 months ago
- Research Fugue: Measuring Power in Political Campaigns wp.me/p19djD-5f 7 months ago
- can we get twitter handles for participants in #uchicagomobileappchallenge? Do people have them? 1 year ago