I’ve been working on a project inspired by the Center for Investigative Reporting and moderated by Kaggle. I used a network analysis of the movement of money between campaign committees to measure the extent to which different campaigns and different committees were more or less independent, controlling, or broadly influential. It turns out that corporations have the most broadly influential committees while the most seasoned congressional candidates are the most independent. However, when you look at the committees that are the most controlling or dependent, things get a bit interesting. You can download the report and raw results at Influence, Control, Dependent, and Independent. The code will be up soon.
RSS
-
Recent Posts
Archives
Twitter Updates
- RT @OSFramework: Is willingness to share data correlated with strength of evidence? bit.ly/1xIaQ0v #OpenData #OpenScience 18 hours ago
- RT @MicrosoftNY: Starting Jan 1, @onemonthedu will be giving 10 scholarships a month to #womenintech: bit.ly/1zEwyn0 by @WJS1988 vi… 3 days ago
- Snitches end up in ditches #dirtysouth http://t.co/f01v2S3lQe 4 days ago
- Put in our Partisan Ideal Points paper for #APSA. It only took 8 hours from registration to confirmation this time. 1 week ago
- RT @bkeegan: Calling all economists interested in social nets: "Sony Attack Is Unraveling Relationships in Hollywood" nytimes.com/2014/12/19/bus… 1 week ago
Categories
Pingback: Winners of Campaign Finance Investigative Reporting Prospect | no free hunch